
doi: 10.1038/181832b0
pmid: 13526681
THE detail seen in a highly magnified electron micrograph is to-day limited more by a lack of contrast in the image than by any lack of resolution in the microscope, which is now usually capable of resolving objects at least as small as 15 A., that is, only a few atoms in diameter. Contrast may be increased either by metal-shadowing the surface of the specimen or by treatment with various reagents. By analogy with the use of stains in light microscopy this latter technique has come to be known as ‘electron staining’ (perhaps this is an unfortunate, if convenient, term since the analogy is not very close). However, it is still not quite clear what physical property makes a substance likely to be useful for increasing contrast. Published statements say variously that high density, high atomic number, high atomic weight or the presence of atoms of a metal are required. Even the extreme claim that all substances are almost equally efficient in increasing electron density has been argued.
Microscopy, Microscopy, Electron, Electrons
Microscopy, Microscopy, Electron, Electrons
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
