
doi: 10.1038/179595b0
FIRST, we must apologize for having evidently given the impression in our original communication, especially in our assumption (iv), that we were intending to use information theory in treating the problem. Our aim, however, was to attack the problem without recourse to the assumptions of this theory. These necessarily involve regarding language as consisting of messages, and the words as being, for all statistical purposes, packets of information. This model is unrealistic as applied to real language situations, on the basis of which the faculty of speech is learned and which even in the most sophisticated communities dominate its natural evolution. We accordingly sought for some approach which would avoid the need for the concept of ‘information’ in the technical sense; our condition (iv) should have been put in the form: “Languages will tend to evolve in such a way that the time required to recall a given number of distinct words is a minimum”. Our unusual mathematical method was designed because of the difficulty in giving an exact formulation of this condition.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
