<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1038/147807a0 , 10.1038/147513a0
Drs. Booth, Mapson and Moore1 feel that in a recent article in Nature2 I exaggerated when I made “an allusion, divorced from its context, to cooked cabbage as having only 17 per cent of the vitamin C of the fresh cabbage”. What I wrote was as follows. “A cabbage bought at the market may perhaps be expected to contain 60 per cent of its original vitamin C content, the housewife probably throws away no more than 20 per cent of the remainder in preparing the vegetable for the pot, leaving 40 per cent [more correctly 48 per cent] of the original vitamin. During boiling, however, about 65 per cent is extracted by the cooking water and usually thrown away. Thus 17 per cent of the vitamin C with which the cabbage left the field is all that remains when it reaches the table.”
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |