
doi: 10.1038/146401d0
THIS reaction1 has been reinvestigated using a reaction tube containing a second short filament adjacent to the catalyst filament, so that adsorbed films on the latter might be detected by a measurement of their contact potential2. In this way it was shown that the filament in its most catalytically active state was free from adsorbed oxygen. Under these conditions, as J. K. Roberts3 has pointed out, the clean wire on exposure to gaseous H2 takes up a stable film of hydrogen, which does not evaporate appreciably at room temperature, and so cannot give a para H2 conversion by the mechanism suggested by Farkas1, namely by H2+2W ⇄ 2WH (where W indicates a surface atom of tungsten). It is, however, possible4 that the conversion might occur by a surface interchange reaction of the type pH2 + WH → 0H2+ HW, and this mechanism gains support from the following experiment.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 168 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
