I CANNOT answer for the implications Mr. Wells has drawn from the other reviewers. For myself, I am amazed that he does not see himself as a propagandist among his other roles. Others do ; and that is good enough for scientific purposes. Talk of the seizure of power in present-day England is, of course, just rubbish. That question has not been raised. What was being discussed was, From which fulcrum would the lever for change to the Wellsian World State be finally applied—Mr. Wells seems to see it in the people in key positions, but paradoxically enough he complains that they have not the brains to see. What then? My contention was that it is not simply an intellectual “seeing” that he must seek but an active desire, a liking for his world solution.