
doi: 10.1038/130962b0 , 10.1038/130962a0
IN his review in NATURE1 of a publication by W. L. McAtee, entitled “Effectiveness in Nature of the so-called Protective Adaptations in the Animal Kingdom”2, “B.P.U.” apparently expresses agreement with that author in interpreting what he believes to be ‘proportional predation’ as evidence of indiscrimination in the choice of food by birds and other predatory animals. Mr. A. J. Nicholson has pointed out that the examination of birds' stomach contents, by itself, can give no evidence of proportional predation.3 There is, however, another aspect of the subject to which I would direct attention.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
