Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1038/109239a0 , 10.1038/109479b0
IT seemed to me that Mr. Marmer's first letter left the impression that the U.S.A. machine is one that is free from serious errors of the order of magnitude of those of the British machines, and I raised the question of proof. I said that I should be very glad to know that this machine could produce hourly heights to within 0.05 ft. with a spring range of 30 ft. I questioned whether it would or would not give errors of 0.4 ft. in such a case. If my doubts are warranted, then the U.S.A. machine also is subject to serious errors, which, as I suggested, would prohibit its use for the research work mentioned above in Mr. Marmer's last paragraph.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 10 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts