Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1038/109236a0
THE older writers and modern text-books affirm that the organic materials (carbohydrates, etc.) manufactured in the leaves of plants are transported downwards by means of the bast through their organs to places of consumption and storage. This belief seems to be based entirely on ringing experiments. A priori the bast appears to be very unsuitable for carrying out this function. Even in the most rapidly assimilating plants its cross-section is small. It is formed of short cells and comparatively short, narrow tubes, so that many cross-partitions must be traversed by the stream carrying these organic substances if they use it as a conduit. Furthermore, its resistance must be greatly increased by the fact that a large proportion of its cross-section is occupied by viscid contents—protoplasm and proteins. Evidently, in such a conduit we could only expect that velocities of transport comparable with diffusion velocities could be attained. Assuming that a 10 per cent, solution of sucrose were supplied by the leaves and that this was completely converted into an insoluble carbohydrate in a storage organ 50 cm. distant, then we might expect, after a steady state had been attained, a rate of transport, from diffusion alone, of about 2 milligrams per sq. cm. per diem. This would be equivalent to a 10 per cent. solution moving at the rate of 0.2 mm. per diem. Although this diffusion rate of transport might be somewhat accelerated by protoplasmic streaming, it is quite evident that diffusion in the bast is inadequate to account for the observed rate of transport of carbohydrates in plants. The insufficiency of diffusion to transport carbohydrates is strikingly borne out by those experiments in which cut floating leaves exposed to conditions suitable for photosynthesis accumulate carbohydrates, while only negligible quantities find their way into the water.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 11 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts