
doi: 10.1038/103045c0
THERE is no warranty for suggesting that “stones resembling anthrax” are anthracite; they are far more likely to have been bituminous coal or lignite, both of which burn more readily than does anthracite, which latter is decidedly difficult of ignition. Whilst European Turkey has not been fully explored for coal, the existence of coal is known in various places; a bituminous coal-seam is reported near Keshan, in the province of Adrianople, and along parts of the northern coast of the Sea of Marmora; and there are lignite deposits known near Rodosto, near Dedeagatch, and even within a short distance of Constantinople. Obviously any of these deposits might have given rise to the stones referred to by Canon M'Clure.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
