Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1038/070055c0
IN your issue of May 5 I see a note in the astronomical column on Mr. Lowell's theory of the Martian canals. It is perhaps not just to criticise it on so short a summary, but there is a point on which I should like to ask a question. If, as Mr. Lowell says, there is not sufficient moisture on the planet to produce vegetation, how does the water return to the poles ready for the next summer? The only way, it seems to me, is by evaporation. His suggestion of artificial waterways to carry the water from the polar caps implies the existence of an atmosphere sufficiently dense to enable intelligent beings to live. That being so, is it not just as plausible that the evaporated water should condense in the form of rain on the general body of the planet as well as at the poles? although, of course, the excessive cold would account for an increased fall at these extremities.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts