Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1038/068007a0
A GOOD deal of discussion has recently been aroused in America by the discovery of the so-called “fossil man of Lansing.” It seems worth while considering the probable stature of the individual to whom the bones belonged. Prof. S. W. Williston, of Chicago, gives in the Popular Science Monthly for March (p. 470) the following values for the bone lengths, without, however, stating how the measurements were taken:—Femur, 43.0 cm.; Tibia, 35.0 cm.; Humerus, 30.2 cm.; Radius, 25.0 cm. From my memoir on the “Reconstruction of the Stature of Prehistoric Races” (Phil. Trans., vol. cxcii. A, pp. 169–244), by using the formulae on p. 196 Dr. Alice Lee has obtained the following results in cms.:—
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts