I WAS about to pen some remarks on Mr. Perry Coste's recent articles on this subject, when a letter from Mr. Gowland Hopkins in the last number of NATURE (p. 581) expressed substantially the same views as those which I had arrived at. I write now rather to support Mr. Hopkins in his strictures than to offer any fresh criticisms of my own. The articles on “Insect Colours” published in these columns are, as the author states, to be regarded in the light of an abstract of a series of more extended papers published in the Entomologist. The papers in the latter publication from their title led us to suppose that Mr. Coste had made some contribution to our knowledge of the chemistry of insect pigments. I read them from month to month in the hope of getting new light on this subject, which is of such general interest to both chemists and biologists: I regret to say that I have been grievously disappointed. The experiments thus far described amount simply to the fact—not altogether astonishing—that strong chemical reagents modify the colours of Lepidopterous pigments or in some cases dissolve them out of the wings. The bearing of these observations on the chemistry of the pigments is so remote as to be practically useless until we know something of the chemical nature of these pigments. The methods adopted by Mr. Coste are not likely to advance our knowledge in this direction very much, and it is certainly remarkable that in treating of yellows he makes no reference1 to the only real contribution to the chemistry of Lepidopterous pigments, viz. the experiments made by Mr. Hopkins, and published in the Proceedings of the Chemical Society in 1889. Mr. Coste is no doubt acquainted with those South American Papilios with a large red spot on the hind wing, which spot loses its red colour and becomes of a brilliant metallic bluish green when the wing is tilted so that the incident and reflected rays form a very wide angle. The colour is in this case doubtless a mixed result, partly due to pigment and partly to interference. Now, anyone who has observed this and other similar colour phenomena in insects might describe his observations as contributions to the physics of insect colours. If he thought proper to adopt this course, he would be misleading physicists. The observation of the bare facts is as much a contribution to the physics of insect colours as the statement that a rainbow can be seen in the sky is a contribution to the physics of illuminated water-drops. It seems to me that Mr. Coste's experiments bear the same relationship to the chemistry of insect colours that the mere observation of interference colours in insects bears to the physics of insect colours.