IN the vegetable kingdom we meet very commonly with gaily-coloured chemical products, essentially connected with the normal processes of development (the chlorophyll of most non-parasitic plants, the splendid rose pigments of Florideae, the many lively-coloured pigments of lichens and fungi), and originating from venomous infection by insects (red-coloured galls of oak-leaves) or from decomposition (red pigments in autumnal leaves). In all these cases these colours appear to us to be merely an accidental quality of the chemical products, and we do not feel induced to start the question of what use any particular colour may be to the plant producing it. But it is quite otherwise with the gay colours of flowers. Bright colours in flowers which especially attract our attention and admiration are in most cases beneficial to the plant itself which produces them, by attracting in like manner also the attention of insects, which, visiting the flowers for their own profit, at the same time unconsciously bring to the plant the great advantage of cross-fertilisation. Hence we understand that bright-flowered varieties, whenever produced by any cause, might be preserved by natural selection, and at last remain the only survivors among all the concurrents of the same species. Thus, the occasional appearance of gaily-coloured varieties granted as a matter of fact, and the peculiarities of colour supposed to be hereditable, we are enabled by Darwin's theory to explain the variety of colours met with in flowers. But we should always bear in mind that we are at present quite ignorant of the chemical processes by which certain colours are produced in the flowers, and of the physical or organic causes by which these chemical processes were effected when they first appeared and are effected in every subsequent generation. Reflecting on the first origin of the adaptation of flowers to the cross-fertilisation by insects, and considering that the oldest and most primitive phanerogamous plants which still exist, the Gymnospermae, are exclusively fertilised by the wind (are anemophilous), whilst the enormous majority of Angiospermae is provided with flowers adapted to cross-fertilisation by insects (entomophilous), we cannot doubt that the original manner of fertilisation of phanerogamous plants was fertilisation by the wind, and that the first plants which adapted their flowers to cross-fertilisation by insects were anemophilous ones, either Gymnospermae or the next descendants of them. Nevertheless the flowers of many Gymnospermae (Abietinae) present a beautiful colour, which attains its culmination during the disseminating of the pollen.* This beautiful colour is apparently neither of any use to these plants, which are regularly cross-fertilised by the wind, nor can have been inherited from ancestors to which it was useful. We may therefore also in this case, without hesitation, regard the colour as a merely accidental phenomenon, which, secondarily produced by the more active chemical processes during the time of flowering, disappears again in the same degree as the intensity of development decreases in the cones. Probably the gaily-coloured perianths of the entomo-philous Angiospermae have originated in a similar manner.