Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Thirty years of recovery policy.

Authors: Amy Banko; Jill Valiant; Kaitlin Mitchell; Crystal Socha; Kenneth J. Gill;

Thirty years of recovery policy.

Abstract

Anthony (1993) proposed recovery as the organizing principle of the public mental health service system. This study examines the evolution of a recovery-oriented mental health system at the federal and state levels in the United States.A rapid review of gray literature analyzed federal policy statements, state mental health policies, service reforms, mental health authority reports, websites, organizational records, and other public documents. The review compiled current recovery-oriented system features in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.Findings highlight expansive but stalled transformation to a recovery-oriented system. Policy statements have made a pronounced shift toward recovery. More recovery-oriented services are being offered. According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's uniform reporting system, many outcomes have improved modestly. However, many features of a recovery orientation have not been fully embraced, implemented, and sustained.Official statements about recovery exist. Practices such as peer services are available in many states, yet the full actualization of a recovery approach remains unfulfilled. Most states would benefit from a concerted effort to fulfill their recovery visions by specifying the features of a recovery-oriented system that they currently lack and aspire to implement. Current implementation science can inform these efforts, including performance-focused, state-level evaluations using common measures tracked on a national dashboard. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!