Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

An agenda for establishing the DSM–5 alternative model of personality disorder (AMPD) trait model in adolescence: Comment on Clark and Watson (2022).

Authors: Rebecca L. Shiner;

An agenda for establishing the DSM–5 alternative model of personality disorder (AMPD) trait model in adolescence: Comment on Clark and Watson (2022).

Abstract

In the years since the publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013), considerable progress has been made in understanding the structure of the traits included in the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) in adulthood. In the next phase of research, the structure of the pathological trait model needs to be established more firmly in adolescence as well. There is promising evidence from studies of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger et al., 2012) that the structure of pathological traits in adolescents shows considerable overlap with the structure in adult samples, but it is premature to conclude that the structure is entirely the same. To make additional progress in assessing personality pathology in youth, measures should be developed in multiple formats and for multiple informants; normal-range personality trait constructs should be included in measures for research and clinical use in young people; and research should incorporate Clark and Watson's (2022) recommendations to add new facets and the domain of Anankastia to adolescent measures of personality pathology. Adolescents stand to benefit from a trait taxonomy in the AMPD that more explicitly includes them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Adolescent, Personality Inventory, Humans, Personality Disorders, Personality

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!