
pmid: 31916800
Data mining methods offer a powerful tool for psychologists to capture complex relations such as interaction and nonlinear effects without prior specification. However, interpreting and integrating information from data mining models can be challenging. The current research proposes a strategy to identify nonlinear and interaction effects by using a deductive data mining approach that in essence consists of comparing increasingly complex data mining models. The proposed approach is applied to three empirical data sets with details on how to interpret each step and model comparison, along with simulations providing a proof of concept. Annotated example code is also provided. Ultimately, the proposed deductive data mining approach provides a novel perspective on exploring interactions and nonlinear effects with the goal of model explanation and confirmation. Limitations of the current approach and future directions are also considered.
Models, Statistical, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Data Mining, Humans, Psychology, Quantitative Psychology, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Monte Carlo Method
Models, Statistical, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Data Mining, Humans, Psychology, Quantitative Psychology, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Monte Carlo Method
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
