
The importance of affective schemas for emotional behavior is well-established, but their properties remain poorly understood. Here, we examined affective schema acquisition (over a ~24-hour consolidation period), updating (assimilation and accommodation), and inference across three novel experimental paradigms. We show that specific learned affective associations become semanticized into generalized affective schemas (negative, positive, and neutral). Once acquired, these schemas can assimilate similar information, accommodate to new inconsistent information, and generate new affective inferences. Valenced affective schemas are acquired faster than neutral schemas, are more difficult to reverse, and facilitate rapid learning and memory for related information. Negative-valenced schemas are most prioritized for learning, most resistant to change, and more effective at facilitating gist-based inferences. These findings demonstrate the properties of semanticized affective memories, how they organize into schemas, how those memories are modified, and how they generate affective meaning-making, offering new directions for understanding how complex generalized emotional memories operate.
Male, Adult, Emotions, Cognitive Psychology, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Article, Other Psychology, FOS: Psychology, Affect, Young Adult, Humans, Learning, Psychology, Female
Male, Adult, Emotions, Cognitive Psychology, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Article, Other Psychology, FOS: Psychology, Affect, Young Adult, Humans, Learning, Psychology, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
