
doi: 10.1037/apl0000812
pmid: 32718154
Extant research on passion is replete with individual-level studies. Although team-level studies have emerged, these empirical studies have adopted a static approach. We pivot from the predominant static focus on passion by examining passion convergence, or the dynamic pattern of increasing similarity in passion among members of a team. Drawing on multilevel theory of emergence in teams and using the novel consensus emergence model approach, we theorize the phenomenon of passion convergence and focus on how within-team experiences of progress and setback shape passion convergence. We also analyze the impact of passion convergence on team performance. Data from 314 individuals nested in 82 new venture teams indicate that experiencing team progress facilitated passion convergence, whereas experiencing team setbacks did not have a significant impact on passion convergence. Results also suggest that teams with members converging on a high level of passion positively predicted team performance. We discuss the theoretical and practical significance of our study. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/entrepreneurship; name=Entrepreneurship, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/549207066; name=Business psychology, team progress, Emotions, :Management [Business], Group Processes, team setback, Humans, consensus emergence model, passion convergence, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3200/3202; name=Applied Psychology, Team Progress, team performance, Passion Convergence
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/entrepreneurship; name=Entrepreneurship, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/549207066; name=Business psychology, team progress, Emotions, :Management [Business], Group Processes, team setback, Humans, consensus emergence model, passion convergence, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3200/3202; name=Applied Psychology, Team Progress, team performance, Passion Convergence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
