
doi: 10.1037/a0038684
pmid: 25705911
The association between the psychosocial work environment, including job demands, job control, and organizational justice, and employee wellbeing has been well established. However, the exposure to adverse work environments is typically measured only using self-reported measures that are vulnerable to reporting bias, and thus any associations found may be explained by reverse causality. Using linear regression models and cross-lagged structural equation modeling (SEM), we tested the direction of the association between established job stress models (job demand control and organizational justice models) and 3 wellbeing indicators (psychological distress, sleeping problems, and job satisfaction) among 1524 physicians in a 4-year follow-up. Results from the longitudinal cross-lagged analyses showed that the direction of the association was from low justice to decreasing wellbeing rather than the reverse. Although the pattern was similar in job demands and job control, a reciprocal association was found between job control and psychological distress.
Adult, Male, Sleep Wake Disorders, Work, hyvinvointi, Job Satisfaction, Young Adult, Risk Factors, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, työympäristö, Humans, Finland, Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, ta3142, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Linear Models, Female, Stress, Psychological, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Male, Sleep Wake Disorders, Work, hyvinvointi, Job Satisfaction, Young Adult, Risk Factors, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, työympäristö, Humans, Finland, Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, ta3142, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Linear Models, Female, Stress, Psychological, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
