
Several recent studies suggest that alcohol-related cues elicit automatic approach tendencies in heavy drinkers. A variety of tasks have been used to demonstrate these effects, including Relevant Stimulus-Response Compatibility (R-SRC) tasks and variants of Simon tasks. Previous work with normative stimuli suggests that the R-SRC task may be more sensitive than Simon tasks because the activation of approach tendencies may depend on encoding of the stimuli as alcohol-related, which occurs in the R-SRC task but not in Simon tasks. Our aim was to directly compare these tasks for the first time in the context of alcohol use. We administered alcohol versions of an R-SRC task and a Simon task to 62 social drinkers, who were designated as heavy or light drinkers based on a median split of their weekly alcohol consumption. Results indicated that, compared to light drinkers, heavy drinkers were faster to approach, rather than avoid, alcohol-related pictures in the R-SRC task but not in the Simon task. Theoretical implications and methodological issues are discussed.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Alcohol Drinking, Conditioning, Classical, VALENCE, Social Sciences, Intention, Neuropsychological Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Young Adult, Avoidance Learning, Reaction Time, CUES, Humans, stimulus-response compatibility, automatic approach, Analysis of Variance, alcohol, Reproducibility of Results, BIASES, Alcoholism, Female, Cues, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, SMOKERS
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Alcohol Drinking, Conditioning, Classical, VALENCE, Social Sciences, Intention, Neuropsychological Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Young Adult, Avoidance Learning, Reaction Time, CUES, Humans, stimulus-response compatibility, automatic approach, Analysis of Variance, alcohol, Reproducibility of Results, BIASES, Alcoholism, Female, Cues, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, SMOKERS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 67 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
