
doi: 10.1029/92wr01207
When conventional statistical techniques are used with model‐simulated flows to estimate flood frequencies for different basin scenarios or for regulated flow conditions, the resulting estimates can appear inconsistent with the simulated flood data. In this paper we describe a new approach for flood frequency analysis of model‐simulated flows. Rather than fitting a probability distribution directly to simulated peak discharges, separate distributions are estimated for runoff volumes and for peak discharges conditioned on runoff volumes. The latter estimation is based on rainfall‐runoff modeling using historical rainfall data for the basin of interest as well as data from extreme storms that have occurred in the region. The modeling of extreme events forces consistency in the resulting flood frequency estimates. An example illustrates the proposed method.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 44 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
