
doi: 10.1029/2010jd014579
[1] In the paper “Sulfuric acid deposition from stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate aerosols” (Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, D14109, doi:10.1029/2009JD011918, 2009), there are two errors that wewould like to correct. The first is an arithmetic error. In contrast to our calculation of the average global surface sulfur emissions of 5.41 × 10 kg Sm a, the correct value is 2.67 × 10 kg S m a. This value was calculated as a reference value, so this correction actually strengthens our conclusions that the additional amount of sulfur from geoengineering would be much smaller than current sources. [2] The second error involves our incorrect application of a formula. In section 4, we convert model output of sulfate deposition, given in kg SO4 m −2 a, to a form used in critical loading studies, mEq m a. Our formula as printed reads
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
