Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Geophysic...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Measurements of the hemispherical‐directional reflectance of snow at fine spectral and angular resolution

Authors: Thomas H. Painter; Jeff Dozier;

Measurements of the hemispherical‐directional reflectance of snow at fine spectral and angular resolution

Abstract

We present 2 days' measurements of the hemispherical‐directional reflectance factor (HDRF) of snow made at fine spectral and angular resolution with the Automated Spectro‐Goniometer (ASG) for the range of solar zenith angles (θ0 = 40°–50°) and snow textures (surface grain size = 80–280 μm). Measurements of the stratigraphy of snow texture and density accompanied each day's suite of measurements. These measurements represent the most detailed available in terms of angular and spectral resolution. The HDRF for fine grain, faceted snow exhibited a local backscattering peak at the view zenith near the solar zenith angle, whereas those for medium grain, clustered snow did not have a local backscattering peak. The HDRF decreased at all wavelengths for an increase in grain radius from 80 μm to 280 μm. However, the decrease in HDRF in the visible wavelengths was largest at θr = 80° in the forward direction and largest for λ > 1.8 μm near θr = 30° in the backward direction. As solar zenith angle decreased from 47° to 41°, the HDRF increased near nadir for λ ≤ 1.03 μm but decreased with coherent angular structure for λ > 1.03 μm. We compared forward radiative transfer modeling results with the HDRF measurements. The forward model used single‐scattering parameters for ice spheres with radii that matched the surface‐area‐to‐volume ratio derived from stereological analysis of snow samples and a stratigraphic distribution of optical depths from measured density and modeled extinction efficiency. All HDRF models underestimated reflectance for λ > 1.30 μm and had large absolute errors in the perpendicular plane. Mean absolute RMS errors in reflectance for the fine grain, faceted snow case were 0.09 at λ = 1.3 μm and 0.14 at λ = 1.85 μm. Mean absolute RMS errors for the medium grain, clustered snow were 0.04–0.06 at λ = 1.3 μm and 0.04–0.06 at λ = 1.85 μm. The models for the more spherical medium grain snow had better overall spectral and angular fits than those for the nonspherical fine grain snow. The spherical radii inferred from the surface‐area‐to‐volume ratio from stereological analysis of snow with nonspherical particles have a greater effective path length than the actual snow particles, resulting in underestimates of hemispherical‐directional reflectance.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    125
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
125
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
bronze