
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1021/ed1001762
Two conventions for preparing dilutions are used in clinical laboratories. The first convention defines an a:b dilution as a volumes of solution A plus b volumes of solution B. The second convention defines an a:b dilution as a volumes of solution A diluted into a final volume of b. Use of the incorrect dilution convention could affect the sensitivity and results of an assay. This could have serious consequences for a patient’s diagnosis. Ideally, all solution concentrations should be expressed as molarity, molality, or normality, but this is frequently undesirable in commercial clinical assay instructions for proprietary reasons. To avoid confusion, it is critical that a statement be included at the beginning of the experimental portion of each protocol explicitly describing how dilutions are to be performed. The American Chemical Society and educators could establish and teach an unambiguous standardized dilution convention. This would ultimately eliminate the problem.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
