Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

FDA finds that FDA is not biased

Authors: Ling-Yee Gibney;

FDA finds that FDA is not biased

Abstract

Following a year-long in-house investigation of employee allegations that the Food & Drug Administration is biased toward the drug industry, Commissioner Alexander M. Schmidt has concluded that not only is there "no evidence to support such charges," but that "there is evidence to refute them." In a 906-page report issued earlier this month, Dr. Schmidt documented allegations made by each individual, questions he posed and answers he received from them during the course of the "open" investigation, and all other relevant agency materials. The investigation took about 16,670 man-hours and cost about $196,000. Last year 11 current or former FDA employees, as well as three agency consultants, told Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D.-Mass.), who chaired joint hearings held by the Subcommittee on Health and the Subcommittee on Administrative Practice & Procedure, that their recommendations to approve drugs were never questioned, but their recommendations to disapprove drugs were almost always questioned. They also test...

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?