Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Computation of enzyme-substrate specificity

Authors: D F, DeTar;

Computation of enzyme-substrate specificity

Abstract

The present study reports the development of a new procedure for teh theoretical computation of enzyme-substrate specificities. The immediate goal has been to identify experimental data with which computations may be effectively compared, examine the underlying theoretical principles, and demonstrate feasibility. The experimental systems treated are hydrolyses catalyzed by chymotrypsin of Ac-Trp-NH2, of Ac-Phe-NH2, and of the Hein-Niemann "locked" substrate derived from phenylalanine; this may be designated as Lock-HN-OCH3. For Trp and Phe, the L enantiomers are substrates while the D enantiomers are inhibitors, thus indicating differences of 7 kcal/mol or more in delta delta G (D-L). For the "locked" substrate, the D enantiomer is the better substrate and delta delta G (D-L) is -4 to -6 kcal/mol. We have used molecular mechanics to compute steric energies of models for the transition state for these hydrolyses and have been able to reproduce the experimental delta delta G values surprisingly well even with a relatively primitive model. The differences in computed steric energies are not due to any one major term but are rather the consequences of summations of a large number of small terms. The new method shows promise of developing into a useful probe for the quantitative study of biochemical systems.

Keywords

Binding Sites, Protein Conformation, Phenylalanine, Tryptophan, Enzymes, Substrate Specificity, Kinetics, Structure-Activity Relationship, Chymotrypsin, Thermodynamics, Amino Acid Sequence, Protein Binding

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!