Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Engineering a Synthetic Ligand for Tumor Necrosis Factor–Alpha

Authors: Nidhi, Gupta; Paul E, Belcher; Stephen Albert, Johnston; Chris W, Diehnelt;

Engineering a Synthetic Ligand for Tumor Necrosis Factor–Alpha

Abstract

One approach to prepare protein binding ligands is to join two low-affinity ligands that bind different sites on the target protein to create a high-affinity bivalent ligand. This typically requires some knowledge of the ligand binding site and requires exquisite orientation of the ligands in order to achieve maximum binding affinity. Here, we explored the limit of affinity improvement possible with no a priori knowledge of peptide binding site and with minimal effort spent in linking the lead peptides. We compared the affinity enhancement from linking two peptides with low affinity for tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFA) to the affinity enhancement from linking affinity improved versions of these peptides using several different scaffolds. We found that we achieved the highest affinity gain not by the precise positioning of the peptides, but rather by using affinity improved versions of the lead peptides to produce synbodies with apparent K(D)'s of 9 to 48 nM. Kinetic analysis showed that the binding kinetics of the synbody are strongly influenced by the kinetics of the starting peptide. This suggests that careful selection of peptides based on their kinetic profile prior to linking will influence the kinetics of the final binding agent.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Kinetics, Binding Sites, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Drug Design, Humans, Ligands, Oligopeptides, Protein Binding

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!