
doi: 10.1021/am100299e
pmid: 20527769
Surface decoration strategy for one-dimensional nanostructures will improve their electrical, optical, mechanical, and electrochemical performances dramatically. Heterogeneous growth/deposition on surfaces, however, may create undesired junction interfaces in the system. Here we report a procedure during which amorphous titania nanotubes are readily self-branched with crystalline titanate nanorods at room temperature. The starting amorphous titania nanotubes were prepared by low-temperature atomic layer deposition combined with the template-directed approach. We routinely observed the self-branching phenomenon of crystalline titanate nanorods with a few nanometers in diameter onto the surfaces of the amorphous titania nanotubes in mild alkali solutions. The resulting structures were analyzed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, and electron energy loss spectroscopy. The reactivity of the hierarchical titania nanotube arrays was observed to be improved as a Li secondary battery electrode. Upon complete consumption of the amorphous body of titania nanotubes, in addition, titanate nanosheets/layers consisting of single TiO(2) layers with unit-cell thickness were obtained, elucidating the formation mechanism of layered titanate materials by alkali treatment.
Titanium, Nanotubes, Temperature, Lithium, Nanostructures, Electric Power Supplies, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Materials Testing, Electrochemistry, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Nanotechnology, Crystallization
Titanium, Nanotubes, Temperature, Lithium, Nanostructures, Electric Power Supplies, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Materials Testing, Electrochemistry, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Nanotechnology, Crystallization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
