The “‘Crisis’ Crisis” in psychology

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jan 2022 English Publisher:Cambridge University Press (CUP)Journal:Behavioral and Brain Sciences, volume 45 (issn: 0140-525X, eissn: 1469-1825,

Authors: John D. Medaglia; Kiante A. Fernandez;

doi: 10.1017/s0140525x21000364

pmid: 35139951

The “‘Crisis’ Crisis” in psychology

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

AbstractThe recent trend to label dilemmas in psychology as “crises” is insidious. The “‘Crisis’ Crisis” in psychology can distract us from actionable practices. As a case in point, “The Generalizability Crisis” offers the valuable central thesis that verbal-quantitative gaps imperil psychological science. Focusing on the key issues rather than crisis narratives can lead to progress in our discourse and research.

Related Organizations

The Ohio State University
United States
Drexel University
United States
University of Pennsylvania
United States

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average