On Internal Structure, Categorical Structure, and Representation
Copyright policy )On Internal Structure, Categorical Structure, and Representation
AbstractIf categorical equivalence is a good criterion of theoretical equivalence, then it would seem that if some class of mathematical structures is represented as a category, then any other class of structures categorically equivalent to it will have the same representational capacities. Hudetz (2019a) has presented an apparent counterexample to this claim; in this note, I argue that the counterexample fails.
- University of Cambridge United Kingdom
50 Philosophy and Religious Studies, 5003 Philosophy, Foundations, relations to logic and deductive systems, Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations
50 Philosophy and Religious Studies, 5003 Philosophy, Foundations, relations to logic and deductive systems, Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!