Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ CJEMarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
CJEM
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
CJEM
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

P053: Communication interruptum: cellphone technology problems in paramedic-physician communication

Authors: D. Eby; J. Woods;

P053: Communication interruptum: cellphone technology problems in paramedic-physician communication

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately 15 years ago cell phones replaced portable VHF radios as the means of communication between paramedics and base hospital physicians. Cellphones, like VHF radio, do not allow voice transmission and reception to occur simultaneously. Radio use requires a learned technique to signal the end of each speaker’s turn talking. These techniques are not used in normal cellphone conversation. Poor cellphone reception and poor technique result in breakdowns in communication. The literature about paramedic-physician telecommunication is almost nonexistent. There is an extensive literature in other industries, such as aviation, concerning problems in radio communication. This literature predicts that communication breakdowns are common and have critical consequences. We sought to determine how frequently problems attributable to cell phone technology arose in paramedic-physician communication. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patch calls between physicians and paramedics from 4 municipal paramedic services from January 01-December 31, 2014. MP3 audio files, recorded during normal operating procedures by the Central Ambulance Communication Centre, were anonymized and transcribed. Transcripts were read multiple times by the authors and analyzed using mixed methods-qualitative thematic framework analysis and quantitative descriptive statistics. Results: 161 calls were identified. 155 tapes were usable for analysis. 127 (81.9%) patches involved termination of resuscitation orders, 28 (19.1%) were for advice or other orders. The data set consisted of 567 pages of transcripts. Communication problems were identified in 138 (89.0%) patches. Most had multiple problems. Technical problems included disconnections (13.5%), or difficulty hearing (56.8%)-indicated by phrases such as “what?”, “I can’t hear you”. Disorganized cell phone technique was common-individuals interrupted each other (34.2%), and talked simultaneously (54.8%). Signalling the end of “talk turns”-using terms such as “10-4” or “over”-was never used. Conclusion: In addition to technical problems (poor transmission, disconnections), disorganized cell phone ‘technique’ caused a high incidence of communication problems. This is concerning because critical clinical decisions (e.g. ceasing resuscitation) depend on clear communication. Understanding the limitations of cellphone technology might improve communication.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze
Related to Research communities