Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo978...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Cambridge Core User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Improved approximations for confidence distributions

Authors: Tore Schweder; Nils Lid Hjort;

Improved approximations for confidence distributions

Abstract

Previous chapters have developed concepts and methodology pertaining to confidence distributions and related inference procedures. Some of these methods take the form of generally applicable recipes, via log-likelihood profiles, deviances and first-order large-sample approximations to the distribution of estimators of the focus estimands in question. Sometimes these recipes are too coarse and are in need of modification and perfection, however, which is the topic of the present chapter. We discuss methods based on mean and bias corrected deviance curves, t-bootstrapping, a certain acceleration and bias correction method, approximations via expansions, prepivoting and modified likelihood profiles. The extent to which these methods lead to improvements is also briefly illustrated and discussed. Introduction Uniformly most powerful exact inference is in the presence of nuisance parameters available only in regular exponential models for continuous data and other models with Neyman structure, as discussed and exemplified in Chapter 5. Exact confidence distributions exist in a wider class of models, but need not be canonical. The estimate of location based on the Wilcoxon statistic, for example, has an exact known distribution in the location model where only symmetry is assumed; see Section 11.4. In more complex models, the statistic on which to base the confidence distribution might be chosen on various grounds: the structure of the likelihood function, perceived robustness, asymptotic properties, computational feasibility, perspective and tradition of the study. In the given model, with finite data, it might be difficult to obtain an exact confidence distribution based on the chosen statistic. As we shall see there are various techniques available for obtaining approximate confidence distributions and confidence likelihoods, however, improving on the first-order ones worked with in Chapters 3–4. Bootstrapping, simulation and asymptotics are useful tools in calculating approximate confidence distributions and in characterising their power properties. When an estimator, often the maximum likelihood estimator of the interest parameter, is used as the statistic on which the confidence distribution is based, bootstrapping provides an estimate of the sampling distribution of the statistic. This empirical sampling distribution can be turned into an approximate confidence distribution in several ways, which we address in the text that follows.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!