<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
INTRODUCTION This chapter follows on from the preceding one and looks at two historically important and highly influential theories of sentence-meaning which, since the mid-1960s, have been associated with the attempt to formalize the semantic structure of languages within the framework of Chomskyan and non-Chomskyan generative grammar. The first is the Katz–Fodor theory of meaning, which originated in association with what we may now think of as the classical version of Chomsky's theory of transformational-generative grammar. The second theory is a particular version of possible-worlds semantics, initiated also in the late 1960s by Richard Montague, and, having been further developed by his followers, is now widely recognized as one of the most promising approaches to the truly formidable task of accounting for the propositional content of sentences in a mathematically precise and elegant manner. The treatment of both theories is very selective and almost completely non-technical. I have been more concerned to explain some of the basic concepts than to introduce any of the formalism. At the same time, it must be emphasized that modern formal semantics is a technical subject, which cannot be understood without also understanding the mathematical concepts and notation that are a part of it. This chapter should definitely be read in conjunction with the more specialized introductions to formal semantics mentioned in the ‘Suggestions for further reading’.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |