
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Introduction This chapter is concerned with the thermodynamic aspects of the fusion of binary mixtures of two homopolymers. The structural and morphological features that result from the departure from equilibrium, and their influence on properties, will be discussed in a subsequent chapter. Binary polymer blends present several different situations. An important distinction has to be made as to whether the components are miscible, immiscible or partially miscible with one another in the molten or liquid state. Flory has pointed out that the mixing of two polymeric components in the liquid state follows normal thermodynamic principles. Since the entropy change of mixing two long chain molecules is small, only a minute, positive enthalpic interaction will produce limited miscibility. It can then be expected that incompatibility of chemically dissimilar polymers should be the general rule. Experiment supports this conclusion. Compatibility, or miscibility, should be the exception. However, many polymer pairs have been found that are miscible, or partially miscible, with one another. Miscibility involves very specific, favorable interactions between the two components. Among the types of interactions involved are hydrogen bonding, charge transfer complexing and dipolar effects. There are different situations within the miscible or partially miscible categories that need to be recognized and analyzed separately. The main groupings are: mixtures of two chemically different species, only one of which crystallizes; two chemically different species, each of which crystallizes independently; two chemically different species that co-crystallize; and mixtures of chemically identical polymer species that either do or do not co-crystallize.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
