Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Experience with augmentation mammaplasty

Authors: Gaspar W. Anastasi;

Experience with augmentation mammaplasty

Abstract

I have had the unique opportunity of participating in the evolution of breast implants. I assisted in the placement of some of the early silicone gel mammary prostheses during my residency in plastic and reconstructive surgery at the Institute for Reconstructive Plastic Surgery at New York University Medical Center, (New York, NY). The implants were large and heavy; the Silastic® envelope was thick, and it had a Dacron® backing (Figure 1). These early implants generally were placed through an inframammary incision into a subglandular pocket. My recollection is that the incidence of capsular contracture was high. In an attempt to prevent contracture, patients' breasts were tightly wrapped to immobilize them, and the patients were not allowed to lift their arms above their heads for 10 days after surgery. The Dacron® patch firmly adhered to the pectoralis fascia, which made its subsequent removal difficult. Later, the basic design underwent several modifications in an attempt to reduce the incidence of capsular contracture, including removal of the Dacron® backing. Gaspar W. Anastasi, MD ASAPS President, 1988-1989 Figure 1 Examples of early silicone gel breast implants. Note the I Dacron® I In the early 1970s, one of my fellow interns, Henry Jenny, MD, went on to assist in designing the early inflatable saline mammary prosthesis. I was enthusiastic about the Jenny implant because it was easy …

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!