Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Current Biologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Current Biology
Article
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Current Biology
Article
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Current Biology
Article . 2004
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Current Biology
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Current Biology
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
Data sources: Crossref
Current Biology
Article . 2004
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Systems biology versus molecular biology

Authors: Charles F. Stevens;

Systems biology versus molecular biology

Abstract

Molecular biology and systems biology provide answers to the same questions, but the answers are quite different for the two approaches and are, on the surface, unrelated. The molecular biological answers are arguably more fundamental and are unique, but alternative systems biology answers are possible – consider the two systems-level answers to the first question. Nevertheless, the systems-level answers can be in some sense more satisfying, because you feel you have an explanation you can understand and use to make testable predictions; a list of genes together with their interactions is perhaps preferred, but much harder to grasp, explain and remember.That the two types of answer seem to be unrelated reveals an essential flaw in the example I have used. In a really good example, the two levels of explanation would be unified so that the molecular biology explanation would also include the systems biology answers, and vice versa. In our example, the molecular biologist would not only have to identify the genetic networks responsible for cortical patterning, but would also have to discover the molecular basis for the rules that lead to the optimal arrangement of cortical areas and to understand the mechanisms used by the developing cortex to ensure conducting components occupy 3/5 of the volume so that cortical function is optimal. Even if you know all the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms that result in 3/5 of the cortical neuropil volume being conducting components, you still can ask why evolution selected that particular mix of mechanisms. The systems-level approach explains the molecular biologist's answer to this question by appeal to a general principle: evolution selects an optimal partitioning of components.The challenge for systems biology is to discover answers to biology's questions, and the challenge for the molecular biologists is not only to provide answers to these questions, but also to explain the answers given by systems biology. And after molecular biology has given its final answers, the systems biologist must identify the general principles that lead to the actual combination of molecular mechanisms. At its best, then, systems biology and molecular biology work hand-in-hand to provide a complete picture of how and why Biology is the way it is.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cerebral Cortex, Neurons, Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all), Models, Neurological, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Biological Evolution, Molecular Biology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Average
Top 10%
hybrid