<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Over the last 15 years diastolic dysfunction has been recognized as a separate pathophysiological and clinical entity. At the same time two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler echocardiography have evolved to become the method of choice to evaluate diastolic function in daily clinical practice. For correct interpretation and assessment of diastolic function parameters from Doppler velocity profiles, their relationship to the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms should be understood. This chapter will focus on the complex interaction between the different determinants of left ventricular diastolic function and the intracardiac Doppler velocity profiles. Ambiguities in interpretation and limitations of the technique as well as the latest technological advances and future directions will be discussed.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |