
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 10933384
One of the most disturbing and provocative reports in recent years has been the tome prepared by the National Academy of Sciences, “To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System” [(1)][1]. The report says that “Sizable numbers of Americans are harmed as a result of medical errors.” The
Medical Errors, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, National Academy of Sciences, U.S., Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, United States
Medical Errors, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, National Academy of Sciences, U.S., Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, United States
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
