
pmid: 11675884
The limited data (n = 42) and diverse pathology within this study make statistical analysis difficult, although the observations are still meaningful. Diagnostic arthroscopy has defined elusive causes of disabling hip pain in an athletic population including occult labral and chondral damage and rupture of the ligamentum teres. Operative arthroscopy has been effective in reducing the symptoms associated with many of these forms of pathology. For more evident causes of hip pain, such as loose bodies or impinging osteophytes, arthroscopy offers an excellent alternative to traditional open techniques. This study has defined that many intraarticular disorders initially may go unrecognized. The benefit of earlier diagnosis seems intuitive and may minimize extraneous investigative studies, but there are a few caveats. First, various forms of extraarticular pathology (e.g., muscle strains) far outnumber intraarticular injuries and thus the temptation for an extensive intraarticular work up for every hip injury should be avoided. Second, as mentioned, does earlier diagnosis always mean early intervention? There is much that we may not fully understand regarding the natural history of many of these intraarticular disorders that we are only now learning to diagnose.
Adult, Male, Physical Education and Training, Adolescent, Middle Aged, United States, Arthroscopy, Age Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Athletic Injuries, Humans, Female, Hip Joint, Prospective Studies, Age of Onset, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Hip Injuries, Sports
Adult, Male, Physical Education and Training, Adolescent, Middle Aged, United States, Arthroscopy, Age Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Athletic Injuries, Humans, Female, Hip Joint, Prospective Studies, Age of Onset, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Hip Injuries, Sports
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 124 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
