Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Lancetarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Lancet
Article . 1989 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
The Lancet
Article . 1989
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

ULTRASOUND-GUIDED CORE BIOPSY

Authors: PaulE. Jennings; Anthony Coral; Jurgen Rode; WilliamR. Lees; JenniferJ. Donald;

ULTRASOUND-GUIDED CORE BIOPSY

Abstract

Between February, 1986, and September, 1988, 404 biopsies have been done, under ultrasound guidance, with a cutting needle fired by a spring-loaded device. Sensitivity for a diagnosis of malignancy was 92.7%; overall accuracy was 94.1%; the predictive value of a positive result was 100% and the complication rate was low. An exact diagnosis could be made from histological examination of the specimen obtained from 98% of positive tumour biopsies. This technique is a simple and safe way to obtain specimens for accurate histological diagnosis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Predictive Value of Tests, Neoplasms, Biopsy, Needle, Histological Techniques, Humans, False Negative Reactions, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    80
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
80
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?