<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

SYNTAX score II

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jun 2013Publisher:Elsevier BVJournal:The Lancet, volume 381, page 1,899 (issn: 0140-6736,

Authors: Patrick M.M. Bossuyt; Ben W.J. Mol; Katrien Oude Rengerink; Parvin Tajik;

doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61151-4

pmid: 23725721

SYNTAX score II

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

1 Farooq V, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, et al. Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II. Lancet 2013; 381: 639–50. 2 Janes H, Pepe MS, Bossuyt PM, Barlow WE. Measuring the performance of markers for guiding treatment decisions. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154: 253–59. 3 Huang Y, Gilbert PB, Janes H. Assessing treatment-selection markers using a potential outcomes framework. Biometrics 2012; 68: 687–96. 4 Song X, Pepe MS. Evaluating markers for selecting a patient’s treatment. Biometrics 2004; 60: 874–83. SYNTAX score II

Related Organizations

University of Amsterdam
Netherlands
Academic Medical Center
Netherlands

Keywords

Male, Decision Making, Humans, Female, Coronary Artery Disease, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Coronary Artery Bypass, Risk Assessment

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	16
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average