Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Lancetarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Lancet
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
The Lancet
Article . 2012
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The rebirth of family planning

Authors: Herbert B. Peterson; Richard Horton;

The rebirth of family planning

Abstract

In 2010 Ban Ki-moon launched his Global Strategy for Women’s and Children’s Health Every Woman Every Child. After a decade of campaigning by public-health scientists and civil society organisations maternal newborn and child survival had finally been embraced as an emergency that demands unprecedented international action. The health of the child and mother had already been expressed in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)4 and 5 respectively. But until 2010 these goals had been in the shadow of their more fashionable close relation MDG 6 (covering AIDS tuberculosis and malaria). Yet even within the continuum of care across the mother and child there was one further neglected dimension - reproductive health which had been excluded from the MDGs when they were first inaugurated in 2000.... We see at least two challenges ahead. First countries and the global community need the political will and capacity to apply the best available evidence to inform and en courage policymakers to take family planning more seriously. That means addressing often large variations in know ledge about family planning within countries and the sometimes strong sociocultural barriers to its delivery that exist. Second there need to be national and global commitments to ensure that the evidence we present here is translated into innovative interventions which are in turn effectively implemented to achieve the goal of universal access to reproductive health. If these twin challenges can be met-using in part the potentially powerful idea of independent accountability-then a judicious fusion of science and advocacy will have been achieved. (excerpt)

Related Organizations
Keywords

Child Health Services, Health Services Accessibility, Women's Health Services, Reproductive Health, Healthy People Programs, Child, Preschool, Family Planning Services, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!