Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Lancetarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Lancet
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
The Lancet
Article . 2009
Data sources: Europe PubMed Central
The Lancet
Article
Data sources: Microsoft Academic Graph
 View all 2 versions
Claim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Unravelling the mystery of the TACT trial

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 May 2009 English Publisher:Elsevier BVJournal:The Lancet, volume 373, pages 1,662-1,663 (issn: 0140-6736, Copyright policy )
Authors: Miguel Martin;

doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60925-9

pmid: 19447241

Unravelling the mystery of the TACT trial

Keywords

Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Docetaxel, United Kingdom, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Research Design, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Female, Taxoids, Fluorouracil, Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!
uploadUpload now