
pmid: 7974938
To evaluate the success and morbidity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) performed in patients aged 65 years and older.A retrospective review of 42 PNLs performed on 33 patients aged 65 years and older was compared with a cohort of 160 PNLs performed on younger patients over the same time period.The presence of complete staghorn calculi (17 of 36 renal units [47%] versus 88 of 160 renal units [55%], p = 0.46) and average stone size (3.8 cm versus 4.3 cm, p = 0.2) were similar for the 2 groups. Eighty-two percent of patients (27 of 33) were stone-free or left with fragments < 5 mm at 3 months after surgery. Elderly patients had a higher transfusion rate after PNL despite similar preoperative hemoglobin levels (11 of 42 PNLs [26%] versus 22 of 160 PNLs [14%], p < 0.01). Serious complications were infrequent and there were no deaths.Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective therapy for elderly patients with complex stone disease; however, awareness of an apparent increased requirement for blood transfusion is warranted.
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Age Factors, Combined Modality Therapy, Cohort Studies, Kidney Calculi, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Lithotripsy, Preoperative Care, Humans, Blood Transfusion, Female, Morbidity, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Nephrostomy, Percutaneous, Retrospective Studies
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Age Factors, Combined Modality Therapy, Cohort Studies, Kidney Calculi, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Lithotripsy, Preoperative Care, Humans, Blood Transfusion, Female, Morbidity, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Nephrostomy, Percutaneous, Retrospective Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
