
pmid: 9830071
Techniques for bonding denture teeth to an acrylic resin denture base remain empirical, with little consensus from the literature, among clinicians, or among dental laboratories.This study evaluated the failure load of acrylic resin teeth bonded to 2 high impact acrylic resins.The ridge lap portion on 120 identical denture teeth were modified with 3 variables: (1) placing a diatoric, (2) using monomer to prewet the denture tooth, and (3) breaking the glaze. Variables were combined to form 6 groups of 10 teeth each, and processed with Lucitone 199 (Lucitone) or SR-Ivocap (Ivocap) acrylic resin. Data analysis included the use of a heterogeneous variance linear regression model.Mean (+/- SD) failure load ranged between 10.25 +/- 1.48 Kg to 28.43 +/- 11.05 Kg for the 6 Ivocap groups and 16.63 +/- 5.87 Kg to 28.05 +/- 5.35 Kg for the Lucitone groups. For Lucitone 199 acrylic resin, the highest failure loads resulted when the ridge lap was left with an intact glaze and did not have a diatoric, with no significant influence from the use of monomer. For Ivocap resin, the highest failure loads resulted when the ridge lap had a diatoric but did not have monomer placed, with no significant influence from glaze.Failure load of bonding highly cross-linked denture teeth to SR-Ivocap or Lucitone 199 acrylic resin was significantly influenced by modifications to the ridge lap before processing.
Incisor, Analysis of Variance, Denture Bases, Materials Testing, Acrylic Resins, Dental Bonding, Humans, Regression Analysis, Dental Restoration Failure
Incisor, Analysis of Variance, Denture Bases, Materials Testing, Acrylic Resins, Dental Bonding, Humans, Regression Analysis, Dental Restoration Failure
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 52 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
