Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Cardiovascular Resea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ACC Current Journal Review
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Cardiovascular Research
Article . 2002 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Cardiovascular Research
Other literature type . 2002
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Defibrillation and cardioversion

Authors: Bernard Lown;

Defibrillation and cardioversion

Abstract

Going back to the ‘archaic past and to obsolete ancestors’ [1] provides insight not only where we came from but where we might be heading. Indeed history matters in medicine as it does in everyday life. It is now 40 years since the introduction of DC defibrillation and cardioversion [2,3]. Like the proverbial pebble cast in the water, the ripple effects of these technologies extend beyond the horizon of early prediction. Among the more important consequences were: stimulating the development of coronary care units, facilitating the emergence of coronary bypass and other heart operations, focusing attention on the still formidable out-of-hospital problem of sudden cardiac death, advancing the field of clinical electrophysiology and contributing to implantable devices to protect against death from malignant arrhythmias. Most important are the countless lives saved with this straightforward medical advance. From time immemorial, drugs, potions and herbs were the mainstay in treating arrhythmias of the heart. This therapeutic approach presented formidable limitations. In the individual patient the effective dose of the drug was unknown. A tedious biological titration was required to avoid serious or even life threatening toxic reactions. When the arrhythmia was ventricular tachycardia, the route for administering drugs was necessarily intravenous, thereby maximizing the likelihood of adverse reactions. When drugs were given orally, the required incremental dosing consumed hours and at times days. Even with the most scrupulous monitoring, toxic reactions were nearly unavoidable. Looking back it is remarkable how the clinical topography has changed since the introduction of DC defibrillation and cardioversion. One example may be illustrative. Levine, during 33 years of clinical practice, observed only 137 episodes in 107 cases of paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia [4]. This represents approximately three patients annually; it may be far less, since all wide complex tachycardias were designated as ventricular. In contrast during …

Related Organizations
Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, Electric Countershock, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Humans, History, 20th Century, United States

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    28
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
28
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze