Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao AORN Journalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
AORN Journal
Article . 1995 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
AORN Journal
Article . 1996
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A Comparison of Two Skin Preps Used in Cardiac Surgical Procedures

Authors: Jan Treston-Aurand; Karen S. Hagen;

A Comparison of Two Skin Preps Used in Cardiac Surgical Procedures

Abstract

ABSTRACTPostoperative surgical site infections contribute significantly to increased patient morbidity and mortality rates and unnecessary hospital costs. Effective and efficient preoperative patient skin preparation is an important perioperative nursing intervention that decreases the number of wound contaminants and reduces the risks for postoperative surgical site infections. This study examined the effectiveness and time and material costs of two preoperative patient skin prep methods (ie, isopropyl alcohol prep/iodophor‐impregnated adhesive drape method, iodophor scrub and paint prep/plain adhesive drape method). The isopropyl alcohol prep/iodophor‐impregnated adhesive drape method clinically was as effective as the iodophor scrub and paint prep/plain adhesive drape method, more cost‐effective when time and materials were compared, and less cost‐effective when materidls alone were compared. To make appropriate decisions about the use of preoperative patient skin prep methods, perioperative nurse managers and staff members need to examine and determine whether costs in time or materials have the greater impact on their surgical settings. AORN J 62 (Sept 1995) 393–402.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Chi-Square Distribution, Time Factors, Administration, Topical, Premedication, 1-Propanol, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Iodophors, Protective Clothing, Adhesives, Costs and Cost Analysis, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Female, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?