<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 8534058
ABSTRACTPostoperative surgical site infections contribute significantly to increased patient morbidity and mortality rates and unnecessary hospital costs. Effective and efficient preoperative patient skin preparation is an important perioperative nursing intervention that decreases the number of wound contaminants and reduces the risks for postoperative surgical site infections. This study examined the effectiveness and time and material costs of two preoperative patient skin prep methods (ie, isopropyl alcohol prep/iodophor‐impregnated adhesive drape method, iodophor scrub and paint prep/plain adhesive drape method). The isopropyl alcohol prep/iodophor‐impregnated adhesive drape method clinically was as effective as the iodophor scrub and paint prep/plain adhesive drape method, more cost‐effective when time and materials were compared, and less cost‐effective when materidls alone were compared. To make appropriate decisions about the use of preoperative patient skin prep methods, perioperative nurse managers and staff members need to examine and determine whether costs in time or materials have the greater impact on their surgical settings. AORN J 62 (Sept 1995) 393–402.
Adult, Male, Chi-Square Distribution, Time Factors, Administration, Topical, Premedication, 1-Propanol, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Iodophors, Protective Clothing, Adhesives, Costs and Cost Analysis, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Female, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Chi-Square Distribution, Time Factors, Administration, Topical, Premedication, 1-Propanol, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Iodophors, Protective Clothing, Adhesives, Costs and Cost Analysis, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Female, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Aged, Retrospective Studies
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |