Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Methodsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Methods
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Methods
Article . 2021
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Differential fluorescence nanoparticle tracking analysis for enumeration of the extracellular vesicle content in mixed particulate solutions

Authors: A, Desgeorges; J, Hollerweger; T, Lassacher; E, Rohde; C, Helmbrecht; M, Gimona;

Differential fluorescence nanoparticle tracking analysis for enumeration of the extracellular vesicle content in mixed particulate solutions

Abstract

A major concern for the extracellular vesicle (EV) field is the current lack of accurate methods for EV quantification. Total protein measurement fails to reliably quantify EVs from serum-containing conditioned media and classical nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) allows quantification and size determination of particles, but fails to discriminate between membrane-bounded EVs, lipids and protein aggregates. However, EVs can be fluorescently labelled with non-specific membrane markers or with antibodies specifically recognizing EV surface marker proteins. Fluorescence-based NTA (F-NTA) is thus emerging as a method for counting and phenotyping of EVs. We have validated a differential NTA/F-NTA method using specific antibodies against surface markers in analogy to flow cytometric analyses.EVs from umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells (UC-MSCs) were isolated by a combined tangential flow filtration and ultracentrifugation protocol. EV preparations from 2 × 107 cells were stained with AlexaFluor 488-conjugated specific antibodies or corresponding isotype controls. Amount and size of particles in normal scattering light mode (N mode) versus fluorescence mode (F mode, laser wavelength 488 nm) was measured using ZetaView Nanoparticle Tracking Analyzer (Particle Metrix). Cryo electron microscopy (EM) was used to verify the presence of membrane bilayer surrounded nanoparticles.All UC-MSC-EV preparations were found positive for typical EV marker proteins and negative for MHC class I. Novel and improved devices that include more sensitive cameras for detection in the fluorescent mode further increase the detection limit.Differential NTA/F-NTA facilitates determination of the percentage of EV marker protein-positive nanoparticles within a mixed particulate solution. The set of markers can be extended to other MSC-EV positive and negative surface proteins in order to establish F-NTA-based profiling as a supporting method for the quantification of EVs.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Staining and Labeling, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Membrane Proteins, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Fetal Blood, Fluoresceins, Antibodies, Extracellular Vesicles, Antigens, CD, Limit of Detection, Humans, Nanoparticles, Sulfonic Acids, Ultracentrifugation, Filtration, Fluorescent Dyes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    50
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
50
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!