
pmid: 39467455
The treatment of status epilepticus (SE) has changed little in the last 20 years, largely because of the high risks and costs of new drug development for SE. Moreover, SE poses specific challenges to drug development, such as patient diversity, logistical hurdles, and the need for acute treatment strategies that differ from chronic seizure prevention. This has reduced the appetite of industry to develop new drugs in this area. Drug repurposing is an attractive approach to address this unmet need. It offers significant advantages, including reduced development time, lower costs, and higher success rates, compared to novel drug development. Here I demonstrate how novel methods integrating biological knowledge and computational methods can be applied to drug repurposing in status epilepticus. Biological approaches focus on addressing mechanisms underlying drug resistance in SE (using for example ketamine, tacrolimus and safinamide) and longer-term consequences (using for example omaveloxolone, celecoxib and losartan). Additionally, artificial intelligence platforms, such as ChatGPT, can rapidly generate promising drug lists, while in silico methods can analyze gene expression changes to predict molecular targets. Combining AI and in silico approaches has identified several candidate drugs, including metformin, sirolimus and riluzole, for SE treatment. Despite the promise of repurposing, challenges remain, such as intellectual property issues and regulatory barriers. Nonetheless, drug repurposing presents a viable solution to the high costs and slow progress of traditional drug development for SE. This paper is based on a presentation made at the 9th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures, in April 2024.
Status Epilepticus, Drug Repositioning, Animals, Humans, Anticonvulsants
Status Epilepticus, Drug Repositioning, Animals, Humans, Anticonvulsants
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
