
handle: 10419/34110 , 10986/5501
Summary There is considerable debate regarding the relative contribution of international migrants’ remittances to sustainable economic development. While officially recorded remittances to developing countries have increased over the last decade, research has not come to a consensus over whether remittances have a positive or negative impact on long-run growth. This paper argues that contradictory findings have emerged when looking at the remittances-growth link because of an omitted variable bias: specifically, remittances will be more likely to contribute to longer-term growth in countries with higher quality political and economic policies and institutions.
Aggregate Productivity, 330, growth, Formation, Institutions: Design, Institutions, Measurement of Economic Growth, O47, Remittances F240, international migration, International Linkages to Development, institutions, Role of International Organizations O190, International Migration F220, Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development O110, Formal and Informal Sectors, ddc:330, O15, Shadow Economy, Cross-Country Output Convergence O470, growth regressions, F22, remittances, Design, Formation, and Operations D020 [Institutions], and Operations D020, Institutional Arrangements O170
Aggregate Productivity, 330, growth, Formation, Institutions: Design, Institutions, Measurement of Economic Growth, O47, Remittances F240, international migration, International Linkages to Development, institutions, Role of International Organizations O190, International Migration F220, Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development O110, Formal and Informal Sectors, ddc:330, O15, Shadow Economy, Cross-Country Output Convergence O470, growth regressions, F22, remittances, Design, Formation, and Operations D020 [Institutions], and Operations D020, Institutional Arrangements O170
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 282 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
